Key Differences Between KKs and GKs

Choosing the right legal structure is a crucial first step when launching a business in Japan. Two common options are the Kabushiki Kaisha (KK) and the Godo Kaisha (GK). While both are business entities, they have distinct legal differences that can impact how you operate.

KKs are the most prevalent structure in Japan, especially for larger, publicly traded companies. Here's a quick look at their characteristics:

• Trust: KKs generally enjoy higher credibility with banks and business partners, which is particularly helpful if you plan to raise capital through stock offerings.
• Setup Costs: Setting up a KK is more expensive. You'll need to notarize your articles of incorporation, which involve fees for the notary and registration.
• Management Structure: Ownership (held by shareholders) and management (run by directors) are separate. This provides a clear division of responsibilities.
• Transparency: KKs have stricter governance requirements, including mandatory shareholder meetings and public disclosure of financial results.

GKs, introduced in 2006, offer a more flexible approach. They're often favored by startups and smaller businesses due to these features:

• Lower Setup Costs: GKs don't require notarization of their articles of incorporation, making them cheaper to establish.
• Combined Ownership and Management: The owners (members) can directly manage the business, leading to faster decision-making.
• Flexible Rules: GKs have more leeway in setting their internal rules, including how profits are shared and who has what authority.
• Less Red Tape: They don't have to hold shareholder meetings or publicly disclose financials, reducing administrative burdens.

In short, KKs are often the better choice for larger businesses where credibility and access to public funding are important. GKs are usually a good fit for startups and smaller businesses that prioritize flexibility and lower costs.

While these structures differ legally, their tax treatment in Japan is largely the same.

Comparing Japanese GKs to US LLCs

The GK structure was inspired by the US Limited Liability Company (LLC). They share some key features:

• Limited Liability: In both LLCs and GKs, the owners' (members') liability is limited to their investment. Personal assets are generally protected from business debts.
• Easy Setup: Both are relatively easy and inexpensive to establish, with flexible operating rules, making them attractive to smaller ventures and startups.

However, there's a major difference in how they're taxed:

• US LLCs: US LLCs can choose "pass-through taxation," which can offer significant tax advantages.
• Japanese GKs: Japanese GKs are taxed like regular corporations.

Let's dive deeper into pass-through taxation.

Understanding the Benefits of Pass-Through Taxation

Pass-through taxation, common in the US, avoids double taxation by passing profits directly to the owners, where they're taxed as personal income. This is a big advantage.

With a traditional corporation (like a US C Corp), the company itself is taxed on its profits, and then shareholders are taxed again when they receive dividends. This is considered double taxation. LLCs and S Corps (another type of small corporation) avoid this. The business profits are only taxed once, at the individual owner's level. This is particularly beneficial for smaller, family-run businesses.

Japanese GKs don't have this option. They're taxed like regular corporations, meaning the business pays corporate tax, and then the owners pay personal income tax on any distributed profits.

Shared Tax Treatment for KKs and GKs in Japan

Despite their legal differences, KKs and GKs in Japan are treated almost identically for tax purposes. There's no real difference in how corporate tax is calculated, how consumption tax works, or how local taxes are applied. Here are some key similarities:

• Corporate Tax: Both are subject to the same corporate tax rate on their taxable income.
• Consumption Tax: Both may be required to register for consumption tax, depending on their revenue.
• Local Taxes: Both pay local taxes like corporate inhabitant tax and business tax.

This means that the choice between KK and GK in Japan is primarily driven by factors other than taxes, such as operational flexibility and strategic goals.

Tax Implications for US Companies with Japanese Subsidiaries

When a US company has a subsidiary in Japan, the subsidiary's legal structure can have tax implications for the parent company.

If the Japanese subsidiary is a GK, the US parent might be able to leverage pass-through taxation in the US, even though the GK itself is taxed as a corporation in Japan. This is because the GK isn't automatically excluded from pass-through treatment under US tax rules.

For example, if the Japanese subsidiary is expected to incur losses in its early years, the US parent could potentially use those losses to offset its own profits for US tax purposes.

However, it's crucial to remember that regardless of whether the US parent uses pass-through taxation, the Japanese GK will still be subject to Japanese corporate tax on its profits.

The Impact of International Tax Rules

When a U.S. company establishes a subsidiary in Japan, it’s crucial to consider the impact of international tax regulations. Key points to keep in mind include:

First, under transfer pricing rules, transactions between the parent company and its subsidiary must be conducted at arm’s length prices. Failure to comply could lead to income adjustments or even double taxation.

Second, the U.S.-Japan tax treaty helps reduce withholding tax rates on dividends, interest, and royalties while aiming to prevent double taxation. However, under U.S. CFC (Controlled Foreign Corporation) rules, a Japanese subsidiary’s income may still be taxable by the parent company under certain conditions.

Additionally, the OECD’s BEPS initiative and the implementation of a global minimum tax are driving greater transparency and consistency in international taxation. This could result in additional tax obligations for the parent company based on Japan’s tax treatment.

To mitigate these risks, it’s essential to maintain proper transfer pricing documentation and apply the tax treaty appropriately. Working with international tax experts and ensuring compliance with both Japanese and U.S. tax regulations is key.

Practical Considerations for Choosing a Business Structure

Here are some practical tips for choosing the right structure:

• Operating Costs: KKs are more expensive to set up, but they project an image of greater stability.
• Flexibility: GKs offer more flexibility in their internal governance and how they operate.
• Tax Implications: Consider pass-through taxation (if applicable), corporate tax rates, and available deductions.
• International Operations: Carefully evaluate the impact of transfer pricing rules and tax treaties.

US CFOs and finance teams should carefully weigh these factors when deciding on the best structure for their Japanese subsidiary.

In Summary

While KKs and GKs in Japan have legal differences, their tax treatment is largely the same within Japan.

However, for US companies establishing a presence in Japan, the tax implications are significant and require careful planning.

US finance professionals considering a Japanese subsidiary need to understand the nuances of both US and Japanese tax law to choose the most advantageous business structure.

Contact us

Complete this form and an RSM Shiodome Partners representative will be in touch.