This article will answer the following questions:

  • Has the Polish legislative envisaged any simplifications in the draft Act implementing Pillar 2?
  • What are safe harbours?
  • What types of safe harbours has the Act stipulated?

The Polish legislative in the draft Act on top-up tax levied on constituent entities of multinational and domestic groups, which is an implementation of the so-called Pillar 2 Directive, provided for solutions that exclude or limit the effect of applying the principles of the global minimum tax. These provisions, being beneficial to taxpayers, can be referred to as "safe harbours". How can they be applied and why can this application pose a challenge if not preceded by a great deal of preparations? 

 

Simplifications provided for in the Polish draft Act implementing the Pillar 2 Directive 

The law on global minimum tax states a number of simplifications and exclusions that can be broken into the following categories:

  1. entity-based exclusions – specifying groups of taxpayers that will not be subject to the top-up tax (for more details go to our previous article);
  2. substance-based income exclusions – thanks to them, entities with payroll and tangible assets will be allowed to bring down the carrying amount of tangible assets from a given jurisdiction by 5-8% and the value of eligible payroll costs incurred by an entity by 5-10%;
  3. the so-called safe harbours – we will discuss them in detail later in the article.

 

What are safe harbours and what is their function?

Safe harbours are solutions introduced in the regulations implementing the Pillar 2 Directive aimed at curbing administrative duties related to computing global minimum tax and – upon meeting certain conditions – allow the taxpayer to assume their top-up tax equals zero.

These types of safe harbours include permanent as well as transitional safe harbours – i.e. safe harbours that will reduce taxpayers' obligations only during the initial period of application of the regulations implementing Pillar 2. 

Types of safe harbours available under the Top-up Tax Act

Safe harbours can be broken into permanent safe harbours and safe harbours that apply during the initial period of the group's activity. Detailed information on safe harbours can be found below.  

 

PERMANENT SAFE HARBOURS

Thanks to the de minimis exclusion, the global top-up tax (or domestic top-up tax) is not computed for constituent entities located in a given jurisdiction, if:

  • the three-year average qualifying revenue of all constituent entities located in that jurisdiction is less than EUR 10 million;
  • the three-year average jurisdictional qualifying income of all constituent entities located in that jurisdiction is less than EUR 1 million or the average jurisdictional qualifying loss of all such entities has been incurred.

It is worth noting that if in the first or second year preceding the fiscal year (or in both of these years) no constituent entity located in a given jurisdiction has generated qualifying revenue or qualifying income (loss), then this particular fiscal year (or fiscal years) is excluded from the calculation of the three-year average qualifying revenue or three-year average qualifying income (loss).

Importantly, the de minimis exclusion cannot be applied to investment entities and stateless constituent entities, and the revenue and jurisdictional qualifying net income (loss) of these entities are excluded from the calculation.

The application of the safe harbour provisions provided for QDMTT allows taxpayers to avoid calculating the global minimum top-up tax for entities from a selected jurisdiction other than Poland, if:

  • all constituent entities located in that jurisdiction for which the taxpayer of the global top-up tax would compute the effective tax rate are subject to taxation with a qualified domestic minimum top-up tax and this tax is payable in full;
  • this jurisdiction has been indicated as meeting the OECD requirements for safe harbours of this type.

Based on the selection of the qualifying group entity, it may – for the purposes of calculating the profit surplus, de minimis exclusion or effective tax rate – adopt simplifications in relation to the constituent entity achieving financial results of low materiality that allow to:

  • determine qualifying income in an amount equal to the revenue of that entity, subject to disclosure in the information on the group of entities;
  • determine qualifying revenue in an amount equal to the revenue of that entity, subject to disclosure in the information on the group of entities;
  • determine adjusted covered taxes in the amount of income tax, subject to disclosure in the information on the group of entities.

A constituent entity achieving financial results of low materiality means a constituent entity together with its permanent establishments that:

  • is not included in the consolidated, externally audited financial statements prepared by the ultimate parent entity due to its small size or immateriality;
  • has total revenues that, within the meaning of the CBCR regulations, exceed EUR 50 million and whose books used to prepare information about the group of entities are kept in compliance with an acceptable accounting standard or an approved accounting standard.

TEMPORARY/TRANSITIONAL SAFE HARBOURS

In the event of a temporary safe harbour for CBCR, no global top-up taxes, domestic top-up taxes or top-up taxes on under-taxed profits are calculated, which are due only for the tax period 2024-2026, if at least one of the three tests is met:

  • de minimis test – confirming that the revenues generated are below a certain threshold (EUR 10 million of revenue, EUR 1 million of income), 
  • effective tax rate test – confirming that the effective tax rate, calculated according to simplified rules, should be 15% in 2023 and 2024; 16% in 2025 and 17% in 2026,
  • routine profits test – confirming that the realised profit is (before tax) equal to or less than the payroll and tangible assets amount.

This safe harbour is mainly aimed at allowing taxpayers to use data based on the CBCR regulations to perform three simplified tests in relation to top-up taxation.

The global top-up tax does not have to be computed by a multinational whose ultimate parent company is located in Poland for a period no longer than the first five fiscal years of the group's operations - provided that these two conditions are met for the year in question:

  • the group’s constituent entities are located in no more than six jurisdictions,
  • the total net book value of tangible assets of all constituent entities of the group is less than EUR 50 million.

Importantly, the five-year period is counted starting from the fiscal year in which the multinational first met the conditions for being subject to global top-up tax.

If the group is willing to take advantage of this exclusion, it must also fulfil administrative obligations, i.e. report the commencement of the initial period of activity to the relevant head of the tax office. In such a case, in order to take advantage of the exemption from global top-up tax in the initial period of business activity, the taxpayer must submit the relevant document by the end of the fifteenth month following the end of the fiscal year. 

Constituent entities of multinational groups located in Poland do not compute domestic top-up tax or top-up tax on undertaxed profits for the first five fiscal years of the initial period of the group’s operation, if the following two conditions are met, in an uninterrupted manner, over the course of this period:

  • the constituent entities are located in no more than six jurisdictions,
  • the total net book value of tangible assets of all constituent entities of the group fails to exceed EUR 50 million.

Domestic groups, on the other hand, do not compute the domestic top-up tax for the first five fiscal years, counting from the first day of the fiscal year in which the domestic group became subject to the global top-up regulations.

Employing safe harbour solutions in Pillar 2 may require the assistance of a tax advisor

The solutions proposed by the Polish legislative are, as you can see, complex. At the same time, their scope is so wide that many taxpayers will have to carefully analyse the impact of the new regulations on the entire group and brace for the implementation of regulations and procedures that significantly affect the way taxes are accounted for. That is why we encourage you to fill in a brief online questionnaire on Pillar 2 and find out if the new regulations will apply to your company. 

One of the key arguments for conducting this initial internal analysis is the chance to significantly reduce your administrative obligations; additionally, this can help you determine whether or not any of the safe harbours is applicable to your company.

You should remember that the draft Act implementing the Pillar 2 Directive in Poland provides for a number of exclusions and simplifications, but in order to be able to utilise them, businesses would have to collect numerous data, which in practice may turn out challenging. Therefore, if you have any questions or need to discuss the subject in detail, we strongly encourage you to contact our experts.